October 17, 2017
By Peter Knauer, Managing Partner and Co-Founder, Sage BioPartners
Corrective action and preventive action (CAPA) policies and procedures have now been a mainstay for years in most life science companies’ quality management systems due to regulation adherence to standards. With impressive technological advances, it is natural that companies are starting to develop products that span multiple sectors, and even multiple regulatory pathways. The question is, what standard/regulation do you use for your CAPA system and how do you cover all the others?
September 21, 2017
By Laurie Meehan, Social Media Manager, Polaris Compliance Consultants
You use computers on a daily basis, and you may even use the system that needs to be audited. But you don’t spend your day thinking about where all the system components are located, how services and software are combined, and what Part 11 requirements apply.
September 10, 2017
By Dave Richardson, Senior Analyst, Cutting Edge Information
It's no secret that pharmaceutical companies have great concerns about their overall compliance efforts. In fact, in several conversations that I've had with executives from marketing, sales, clinical, medical and other functions, it's rare to hear that compliance isn't a hot-button issue.
September 1, 2017
By David Cornwell, Founder/CEO, PleaseTech Ltd.
This blog post is primarily about how PleaseReview can assist life science companies in the process of complying with the European Medicines Agency (EMA) transparency policy 70 on the publication of clinical data. However, it also discusses how we at PleaseTech plan to expand PleaseReview’s redaction (or masking as it is sometimes known) capability over the next six months, so this post may be of interest to those readers with other redaction challenges.
When an FDA inspector comes to your door, it is usually a time of stress and uncertainty. You need to handle logistical elements like where the inspectors are going to be placed, how you.
August 24, 2017
By Stephanie Gaulding, CQA, CPGP, DPS Engineering
I had the pleasure spending two days networking and discussing quality metrics and quality culture with industry and FDA leadership at PDA's 2017 Quality Metrics and Quality Culture Conference last February. This year's conference included some of the most candid and honest dialog on these topics that I've seen between industry and FDA to data. I thought I would share some of the messages and my takeaways from the two-day event.
August 14, 2017
By Steve Tyrell, Senior Director, Business Development, Regulatory Compliance Associates Inc. and Lisa L. Michels, General Counsel and Regulatory Affairs Expert, Regulatory Compliance Associates Inc.
Insights on working with regulatory bodies on novel devices such as artificial intelligence, machine learning and algorithms.
July 11, 2017
By Keith Matthews, Director Quality Systems, Regulatory Compliance Associates Inc.
Developing a quality system is the foundation for ensuring the organization’s products or services are safe, effective and controlled to deliver customer satisfaction. Throughout the organization’s lifecycle, from start-up through maturity, the quality needs of the firm, along with its budget constraints, are continually evolving. Maintaining compliance with regulations while controlling costs represents a challenging balancing act we encounter in our life science consultancy.
June 15, 2017
By Susan Schniepp, Distiguished Fellow at Regulatory Compliance Associates, Inc
One of the most discussed and debated topics on today’s pharmaceutical landscape is the issue of quality metrics. Establishing, maintaining, and interpreting quality metrics to determine the suitability of pharmaceutical products has become a high priority for the FDA. To understand the issue of quality metrics it is important to start at the beginning.
June 8, 2017
By Vivian Bringslimark, President and Owner, HPIS Consulting, Inc.
While training may appear to be straightforward to most leaders, the effectiveness follow up is anything but clear-cut. So why do business leaders frown when the answer to the training effectiveness question is – it depends?
Patients of Alzheimer’s disease, their families, and health care advocates recently encountered back-to-back disappointments when two clinical trials for Alzheimer’s drugs failed in quick succession. First, Eli Lilly & Co. stopped its late-stage clinical trial for solanezumab, then Merck & Co. ended its clinical trial for verubecestat. Both studies failed to show efficacy.
May 23, 2017
By Marci Crane, Staff Writer, MasterControl
It’s difficult to label any phobia as the “strangest” because most phobias are considered kooky, weird or downright bizarre. Phobias are also nearly impossible to understand with the logical mind – they just don’t seem to make sense! However, for those experiencing a true phobia, logic doesn’t make one bit of difference. The terror is still alive and well.
April 27, 2017
By Drew Locher, President, Change Management Associates
If you are applying lean management principles to R and D, life science, or other knowledge work processes, you’ve probably heard the ""we're different” argument. It usually goes something like this, “You can’t apply lean process improvement techniques to creative work because everything we do varies.
April 18, 2017
By Marci Crane, Staff Writer, MasterControl
The following article is a Q&A regarding the release of the Global Harmonization Task Force Final Document: Role of Standards in the Assessment of Medical Devices (acknowledged in this article as the RSAMD final document).1 Q: What is the Global Harmonization Task Force (GHTF)? A: The GHTF is a voluntary group that consists of trade association and medical device authorities from the USA, Canada, Europe, Japan and Australia. Q: Who is the authoring group for the RSAMD final document
April 18, 2017
Antoinette Azevedo, Founder of e-SubmissionSolutions.com
The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is taking concrete steps to require the submission of all types of regulatory communication in electronic format. Globally, regulatory authorities are all moving to require electronic submission of regulatory communication. The reasons are many but one reason is clear: the public safety responsibilities of the regulators requires significantly faster access to content that can be supported by paper format.
As of June 1st, 2009 the FDA will no longer accept Establishment Registrations or Product Listings submitted on paper for human prescription drugs, human over-the-counter drugs, or listed biologics and veterinary medicines. After that date, all such filings must be made electronically through the FDA's electronic submission gateway and encoded in XML, according to the rules set out in the HL7 Structured Product Labeling (SPL) standard and the FDA implementation guide. Medical devices are not c
As regulatory agencies such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and parallel agencies in Europe, Japan, and Canada, move toward a completely electronic submission environment, tools like templates for Microsoft Word® become increasingly essential to submissions content development processes. Templates can be essential during the preparation of electronic common technical documents, or eCTDs. The eCTD is a standard created by the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH), a
