Showing items tagged as Quality and Compliance

  • Regulatory Records Primer Part 1: Decoding the Requirements for Medical Device Manufacturers

    21 August, 2014 Les Schnoll, Quality Docs, LLC

    The Quality System Regulation (QSR) is premised on the theory that the development, implementation, and maintenance of procedures designed to carry out the requirements of the regulation will assure the safety and effectiveness of medical devices. Therefore, it is easy to see the importance of the records required to document the implementation of those quality system procedures. One of the basic themes of the Quality System Inspection Technique (QSIT) (used during inspections of medical device manufacturers) is the “Establish Test.” The QSR requires many procedures to be “established” and defines “establish” as “define, document (in writing or electronically), and implement.”

    Full story
  • Medical Device Development: Thinking Globally, Acting Locally

    14 August, 2014 by Timothy Blair, Director, Global Business Development, NAMSA and Seth J. Goldenberg, PhD, Senior Principal Scientist, NAMSA

    The global healthcare and healthcare service market will maintain steady growth due in large part to an aging population that is living longer and to improved healthcare services in emerging markets that include China, Brazil, India, Japan, Israel, and South Korea, among others. It is interesting to note that countertrends seem to be developing in the medical device space; for example, hospital utilization of medical devices has slowed significantly, reimbursements continue to tighten, and there was a first-time global decrease (5%) in US premarket approvals (PMAs) in 2012, a trend that continued into 2013. There were also fluctuations in investor healthcare spending across 2012, drops in mergers & acquisitions deal value and deal counts, and a device tax that is adding to the squeeze.

    Full story
  • Certification: Is It Worth the Hassle?

    12 August, 2014 by Lisa Weeks, Marketing Communications, MasterControl

    In the life sciences and other regulated industries, obtaining certification in a range of international standards has become a necessity for companies hoping to access and compete in today’s global marketplace. Whether your organization is a laboratory, medical device manufacturer, or automobile maker, becoming certified by an impartial third-party accreditation body assures potential customers that you value quality and your products conform to the highest regulatory standards. This assurance can lead to tremendous marketing and business advantages. But certification can be a long and trying process.

    Full story
  • Questions All Auditors Should Ask: The Use and Misuse of Audit Checklists

    31 July, 2014 by Laurie Meehan, Polaris Compliance Consultants, Inc.

    There’s nothing wrong with using a good checklist, as long as you remember that there will always be something wrong with your checklist. It is simply not possible to develop a checklist that will get to the core of every problem, that will cover every scenario, or that will ever be any reasonable substitute for that all important question: “Why?” So how can you develop the best checklists possible and avoid relying on them too heavily?

    Full story
  • Current Issues in Medical Device Risk Management

    29 July, 2014 by Edwin Bills, RAC Consultant

    Medical devices have been developed with some requirements for product safety since the implementation of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976 to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act.  Initially FDA required manufacturers to submit information related to safety as part of the 510(k) premarket notification process, providing comparative data on predicate devices versus the device under consideration.  In the more rigorous Premarket Approval (PMA) process, more detailed safety inform

    Full story
  • How to Conduct Better Effectiveness Checks and Management Reviews within Your CAPA Process

    24 July, 2014 by Lisa Weeks, Marketing Communications, MasterControl

    In the final segment of a three-part QEM/CAPA webinar series, quality expert Ken Peterson discusses the importance of effectiveness checks within the CAPA process. He also explains the difference between process verification and process validation, and why knowing which process to use (and when to use it) is paramount to a successful CAPA methodology. Peterson closes the webinar by summarizing the current models and best practices being used in management review, data collection, and charting to enhance CAPA decision making in all areas of your business. This is a summary of that discussion. If you wish to view the webinar in its entirety, please click on the link provided at the end of the post.

    Full story
  • Listening and Being Heard are Important to Regulated Companies

    3 July, 2014 by Brian Curran, Senior Vice President, Product Management and Strategy, MasterControl Inc.

    If you’re wondering why your company should listen to your customers, or why as a customer you should be heard, just think of Twitter. Twitter and hashtags seem synonymous. But hashtags didn’t exist until a user suggested it in 2007. It took two years before Twitter, which was founded in 2006, started hyperlinking hashtags.

    Full story
  • Creating a Global Regulatory Plan

    24 June, 2014 by Cheryl Wagoner, Wagoner Consulting LLC

    Having and maintaining strong global regulatory strategy and plans can help your business not only stay in compliance but can be an integral part of corporate market growth strategies. How many of us have jumped into a new market before fully understanding the regulatory requirements and the potential impact of those requirements? If you have, you are not alone. Mapping the requirements as part of your strategic planning may help you identify a great new market or help you avoid a costly mistake.

    Full story
  • 3 Common Cybersecurity Mistakes in Pharma (and How to Avoid Them)

    17 June, 2014 by Jim King, Senior VP of Technical Support & Infrastructure, MasterControl Inc.

    Due to the ever-rising position of information as a valuable commodity, organizations must take steps to protect their data. For pharma and life sciences companies, the question is not if their digital data will be compromised, but when. Here are three common security mistakes made by enterprises and ways to avoid those mistakes by focusing on employee behavior.

    Full story
  • Quality’s Role in Drug Approvals

    12 June, 2014 by Theresa Allio, Ph.D.

    In a recent review, I summarized the underlying reasons contributing to delayed market entry for 51 product applications submitted to CDER between 2009 and 2012.1 Reasons cited in the complete response letters issued for these applications covered a number of areas, including safety, efficacy, regulatory, labeling and quality related issues. Quality- related issues were one of the most prominent reasons for delay of market entry with deficiencies being cited in 20/51 (39%) of applications. GMP inspection failures and data deficiencies contributed equally to the quality citations. The prominence of quality-related issues in the delay of product approvals emphasizes the importance of robust quality programs in drug development. Understanding what elements have posed as hurdles in past development programs will help a sponsor avoid these pitfalls in the future.

    Full story
  • The Top 6 Pains in DHF Management

    20 May, 2014 by Matthew M. Lowe, Executive Vice President, MasterControl Inc.

    In my experience working in medical device product development and product management, maintaining the design history file (DHF) posed daunting challenges because it was a process that continued throughout the lifecycle of a product. Even years after a medical device is launched, it’s not uncommon for the technical lead to revisit the DHF because the product is undergoing an iteration or it’s being launched in another part of the world.

    Full story
  • Strategies for Addressing the Top 3 Quality Pains in a Regulated Environment

    8 May, 2014 by Paul Sanderson Lead, Solutions Consultants Group, MasterControl Inc.

    In the past 10 years that I’ve been working with highly regulated companies, I’ve seen many organizations find out the hard way that quality does not occur by accident. Quality requires good planning, design, and execution.

    Full story
  • Making SMART Choices When Managing Quality Events: More Helpful CAPA Tips

    2 April, 2014 by James Jardine, Marketing Communications, MasterControl Inc.

    A previous blog post provided an overview of a portion of quality guru Ken Peterson’s “Taking Effective Action” webinar (the second of a three-part series) that outlines the keys to successful CAPA programs. This post summarizes the remainder of the second webinar in the series which can be viewed here.

    Full story
  • MasterControl 's Ken Peterson and Patricia Santos-Serrao Featured SQA Speakers

    1 April, 2014 by Robyn Barnes, Marketing Communications, MasterControl Inc.

    MasterControl will provide demonstrations of its document management and quality management solutions at the 30th Society for Quality Assurance (SQA) Annual Meeting to be held April 6-11, 2014 at the Cosmopolitan of Las Vegas in Las Vegas, Nevada.

    Full story
  • Taking Effective Actions: CAPA Webinar Part 2

    25 March, 2014 by James Jardine, Marketing Communications, MasterControl Inc.

    In the second webinar of a three-part series from MasterControl, quality expert Ken Peterson demonstrates how companies can develop better corrective and preventive actions (CAPA) to ensure quality and compliance. In the second installment, Peterson focuses on key decision points and the types of actions that should be taken depending on the quality event. He points out the importance of containing issues at the department level, if possible, before moving them into a formal CAPA process. Peterson discusses four possible actions to be taken when dealing with quality events: no action (the “wait and see” approach), corrections (with a focus on the immediate situation or containment), corrective actions, and preventive actions (to preemptively deter issues from occurring in the future).

    Full story
  • Making the Business Case for Implementing an Electronic QMS

    18 March, 2014 by Lisa Weeks, MasterControl Inc., Marketing Communications

    In a tough economy, quality professions often find themselves having to convince management that swapping their paper-based QMS for an electronic one is worthy of the expense and will translate into bottom-line, as well as compliance, benefits. While the regulatory and legal drivers for automating your quality processes are irrefutable, the frequently overlooked operational and business opportunities enjoyed by organizations that implement an electronic QMS are equally compelling. Simply put: compliance is good for business, and the right QMS software can help you transform your compliance challenges into tangible business advantages.

    Full story
  • Sound Risk-Based Decision Making in Process Validation

    13 March, 2014 by Robyn Barnes, Marketing Communications, MasterControl Inc.

    There were so many people everywhere you went that it felt like a real crush. I’ve got to tell you that a foot massage every night would have been really useful. “

    Full story
  • Four Team Members to Include When Building Your Software Implementation Dream Team (and Two to Avoid)

    11 March, 2014 by Stephanie Jones, Professional Services Consultant, MasterControl Inc.

    According to a study by Gartner Research, nearly four in ten major software purchases end up as “shelfware,” i.e., software that is purchased and never implemented or only marginally configured and/or deployed. Why? Often, it is because of the application itself or the perceived unresponsiveness of the software vendor’s implementation consultants. Rather than compromise efficiency, or redesign proven processes which took years to develop and implement, an organization will opt to delay or abando

    Full story
  • Be SMART: 5 Critical Factors in CAPA

    4 March, 2014 by Cindy Fazzi, Marketing Communications Specialist, MasterControl Inc.

    It’s not enough to come up with a corrective action for a quality event. It’s critical to have the right action that actually fixes the problem and prevents it from recurring.

    Full story
  • Quality Event Management: Free Recorded Webinar Shows How a Closed-loop Methodology Can Improve CAPA Systems

    27 February, 2014 by James Jardine, Marketing Communications, MasterControl Inc.

    Quality guru Ken Peterson has dedicated his career to helping organizations like Abbott Laboratories, Kodak, and IBM devise better quality management solutions that allow them to maximize efficiency and resolve problems faster. In the first of a three-part series of complimentary webinars available from MasterControl, Peterson breaks down quality management into three distinct segments: quality events, issue review, and corrective and preventive actions (CAPA). You can view the free webinar in its entirety here. No registration is required to access the recorded presentation—just click and play!

    Full story