WHAT WE OFFER
Everything you need to know about what makes MasterControl the right solution for you.
Take a look at our pricing plans and request an estimate that works for your business.
JOIN OUR TEAM
BECOME A PARTNER
As clinical trials continue to expand globally, technology plays a critical role in maintaining data integrity and at the same time accelerating study start-up. Consider a study management team that must travel globally to hold investigator meetings. Travel now takes up a much greater portion of the study management team’s time and energy. That’s why study teams have turned to eClinical technology to reduce this effort – from preclinical R&D and regulatory communication to packaging/di
As a sponsor or CRO, you understand the importance of a thorough site selection process. A site needs to be able to meet enrollment targets and timeframes, protect the rights and safety of study participants, execute the protocol, deliver quality data, and maintain GCP compliance. That’s what your site feasibility surveys and pre-study visits are designed to evaluate. And as you’re assessing a site’s abilities, the site is conducting its own feasibility process. They’re mining their patient data
Investigative sites are the heart and soul of clinical trials, essential to ensuring the efficacy and safety of pharmaceutical compounds in humans. Site selection is pivotal to the successful execution of trials, which are not only long and bureaucratic, but are also experiencing diminishing returns. Studies estimate that it costs upwards of $2B dollars to bring a new drug to market, with daily revenue losses in ranging from $1M to $8M due to delayed market entry.
Developing safe and effective drugs requires a coordinated effort across a diverse set of disciplines. This is easier to observe at some points in the process than at others. Once a product is well into human trials, it can be easy to forget that developments on the manufacturing side of the house can affect the clinicians who are conducting the studies.
Patients of Alzheimer’s disease, their families, and health care advocates recently encountered back-to-back disappointments when two clinical trials for Alzheimer’s drugs failed in quick succession. First, Eli Lilly & Co. stopped its late-stage clinical trial for solanezumab, then Merck & Co. ended its clinical trial for verubecestat. Both studies failed to show efficacy.
When it comes to the conduct of pediatric clinical trials, there are number of things you need to consider in order to ensure the successful conduct of a study. From study design to logistics to recruitment, there are real differences between studies conducted in pediatric populations and studies conducted in adult populations.
When you think of countries as candidates for clinical trials, which ones come to mind? North America, Great Britain, France?
Our social sites: